0 seconds of 0 secondsVolume 90%
Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts
Keyboard Shortcuts
Play/PauseSPACE
Increase Volume
Decrease Volume
Seek Forward
Seek Backward
Captions On/Offc
Fullscreen/Exit Fullscreenf
Mute/Unmutem
Seek %0-9
00:25
00:00
00:00
 
There are no markers for this video.
00:00:00Support
00:00:00for the Statehouse News Bureau
00:00:02comes from Medical Mutual,
00:00:03dedicated to the health
00:00:03and well-being of Ohioans,
00:00:05offering health insurance
00:00:05plans, as well as dental,
00:00:08vision and wellness programs
00:00:08to help people
00:00:10achieve their goals
00:00:10and remain healthy.
00:00:12More at Med mutual.com.
00:00:14The law offices of Porter,
00:00:14right, Morris and Arthur LLP.
00:00:17Porter Wright is dedicated
00:00:17to bringing inspired legal
00:00:21outcomes to the Ohio business
00:00:21community.
00:00:23More at porterwright.com.
00:00:25Porter Wright
00:00:25inspired Every day
00:00:27in Ohio Education Association,
00:00:27representing 120,000
00:00:31educators who are united
00:00:31in their mission
00:00:33to create the excellent
00:00:33public schools.
00:00:35Every child deserves
00:00:35more at OHEA.org.
00:00:39House Republicans
00:00:39unveil their changes
00:00:41to governor Mike
00:00:41DeWine budget. We'll go over
00:00:43many of them this week
00:00:43in the state of Ohio.
00:01:03Just.
00:01:04Welcome to the state of Ohio.
00:01:06I'm Karen Kasler.
00:01:08As was widely expected.
00:01:09House Republicans
00:01:10threw out tax hikes
00:01:10introduced by governor
00:01:12Mike DeWine
00:01:12and his executive budget,
00:01:14and also added in other big
00:01:14changes.
00:01:17the budget.
00:01:17I think there's been greater
00:01:19degree of participation
00:01:19from members
00:01:21in putting this budget
00:01:22together than than at any time
00:01:22that I've seen.
00:01:25We started
00:01:25with roughly 3000 amendments
00:01:27submitted by members about
00:01:271200 of those were unique.
00:01:31The House budget,
00:01:31which includes $62 billion
00:01:34in state only general revenue
00:01:34funds and $202 billion
00:01:38when all funds are added
00:01:38in cuts.
00:01:40DeWine's proposed
00:01:40tax increases on cigarets,
00:01:43sports gambling
00:01:43operators and marijuana.
00:01:45Republicans said their budget
00:01:45boosts funding to K through
00:01:4812 schools by $226
00:01:48million over
00:01:51DeWine's budget and ensures
00:01:51no district is caught,
00:01:54but it does not fully fund
00:01:55the implementation
00:01:55of the final
00:01:57two years of the bipartisan
00:01:57Fair School Funding plan,
00:02:00approved in 2021 with a six
00:02:00year phase in the budget,
00:02:04also includes a provision
00:02:04that caps the funds
00:02:06that school districts
00:02:06can carry over
00:02:08in their operating budgets,
00:02:08if that goes over 25%.
00:02:12That money is refunded
00:02:12to taxpayers.
00:02:14It's being billed as immediate
00:02:14property tax relief.
00:02:17but there's no income tax cut.
00:02:20we wanted to make sure
00:02:20that there was in this General
00:02:23Assembly enough money to fund
00:02:23the things that we have.
00:02:25There are folks who think
00:02:25we should have funded
00:02:29things that we didn't.
00:02:32So, you know, we've done a
00:02:33tremendous amount
00:02:33of income tax
00:02:35and best
00:02:38in the last 20 years,
00:02:39getting it down
00:02:39to two brackets.
00:02:41So the fundamental question
00:02:41that needs to be studied
00:02:43for those who want to
00:02:43eliminate income tax is
00:02:47either we're going to
00:02:49cut public services
00:02:49or increase other taxes,
00:02:53and those are larger people.
00:02:55Professional business
00:02:55introduction
00:02:58make under $300,000.
00:02:59You don't pay income tax now.
00:03:01And so if you make
00:03:01less than 26,000
00:03:05and so that that's
00:03:05going to adversely
00:03:08affect that group of people,
00:03:08you know,
00:03:09with fewer services
00:03:09and higher taxes.
00:03:12And also Republicans
00:03:12also put into the budget
00:03:15a $600 million package
00:03:15of state backed bonds
00:03:18for a $3.4 billion stadium
00:03:18and development
00:03:21for the Cleveland
00:03:21Browns in Brook Park.
00:03:23The team's owners say
00:03:24it will generate $1.3 billion
00:03:24more than will be needed
00:03:28for the state to pay back
00:03:28those bonds over 30 years,
00:03:31which will total almost
00:03:31$1 billion.
00:03:34They also cut DeWine's sports
00:03:34facilities fund
00:03:37that was backed
00:03:37by a doubling of the sports
00:03:38gambling operators tax,
00:03:40as well as the cigaret tax
00:03:40for a $1,000 child tax credit,
00:03:44and the marijuana tax
00:03:44for a bunch of things
00:03:47such as the 988 suicide
00:03:47hotline
00:03:49and grants to bring driver's
00:03:49ed back to high schools.
00:03:52this is not a process
00:03:54where the governor shows up
00:03:54and says, here's what I want.
00:03:57You know, we tried to do
00:03:57a couple of things.
00:03:58There's
00:03:58obviously a lot of people with
00:04:00with a lot of different,
00:04:00opinions about what they want.
00:04:04I had a great meeting
00:04:04with governor DeWine today.
00:04:06He didn't
00:04:06grab me by the throat
00:04:07and, you know,
00:04:08shoved me up against the wall
00:04:08or anything like that.
00:04:10DeWine has not shared
00:04:10his thoughts on the budget
00:04:12so far, but House Democrats
00:04:12say they will not support it.
00:04:16exists as it currently exists?
00:04:16Absolutely not.
00:04:19This budget is saying
00:04:19if you are a billionaire,
00:04:21get to the front of the line.
00:04:22If you are a rich family
00:04:22that wants vouchers
00:04:25for your kids,
00:04:25get to the front of the line.
00:04:27If you are a pregnant woman,
00:04:27if you are a senior,
00:04:30if you are a hungry child,
00:04:30if you are a public,
00:04:32school,
00:04:32get to the back of the line
00:04:34because we're going to fund
00:04:34those people first.
00:04:36What do you
00:04:36we are looking at a budget
00:04:38that is doing things
00:04:38like taking away led abatement
00:04:41programs, to prevent lead
00:04:41poisoning and children
00:04:44taking way home visits,
00:04:44to reduce infant mortality
00:04:48in our communities,
00:04:48taking away
00:04:50Medicaid services,
00:04:50for moms and babies.
00:04:54And the fact
00:04:54that we're even talking about
00:04:56or even it's
00:04:56in the realm of consideration
00:04:58that we're going to get
00:04:58a $600 million
00:05:00giveaway to billionaires
00:05:00is absolutely absurd.
00:05:03I sat down this week
00:05:03to discuss
00:05:05some of the biggest pieces
00:05:05of the budget
00:05:07with House Finance
00:05:07Committee Chair Brian Stewart,
00:05:10who is the sponsor
00:05:10of the two year spending plan.
00:05:12Let's start
00:05:12with the tax increases
00:05:14that were removed on cigarets
00:05:14to find $1,000 child tax
00:05:17credit on sports
00:05:18gambling operators
00:05:18for sports facilities,
00:05:20find on marijuana
00:05:20for a bunch of things,
00:05:22including the 988
00:05:22suicide hotline
00:05:24grants to bring driver's
00:05:24ed to high schools.
00:05:26You said
00:05:26there was a widespread belief
00:05:28among members
00:05:29of the Republican caucus
00:05:29that you don't want
00:05:31to raise taxes on Ohioans.
00:05:33Why not allow these use taxes
00:05:35or syntaxes
00:05:35for people who want to engage
00:05:38in these kind of things?
00:05:39Why not let the state
00:05:39make money on that?
00:05:41Well, state
00:05:41is making money on that.
00:05:42We passed sports betting not
00:05:42that long ago at a 10% rate.
00:05:45We already doubled it to 20%.
00:05:47Going to 40%
00:05:47would have put us, you know,
00:05:49one of the highest tax rates
00:05:49in the entire country.
00:05:51That's not where we want to
00:05:51be. That's a tax.
00:05:53It will ultimately get
00:05:53passed on to, to Ohioans.
00:05:56You know, Ohioans voted for
00:05:56a 10% tax rate on marijuana.
00:05:59They didn't vote for a 20%
00:05:59tax rate on marijuana.
00:06:02And just generally, look,
00:06:03we have a philosophical
00:06:03difference with,
00:06:04you know, some of our friends
00:06:04in the other party
00:06:06that we don't want to raise
00:06:06taxes.
00:06:07We're not going to kind of
00:06:08pick and choose
00:06:08which taxes we like.
00:06:10These are ultimately borne
00:06:10by our citizens.
00:06:12We didn't think
00:06:12they're warranted.
00:06:13And so we're glad there's no
00:06:13tax increases in this budget.
00:06:16You said differences with
00:06:16people in the other party,
00:06:18but these were from
00:06:18governor Mike DeWine. Well,
00:06:22fair enough.
00:06:22And, the governor
00:06:24has his view, and we've,
00:06:24agreed on many things
00:06:27and disagreed on others.
00:06:28And when it comes to taxes,
00:06:29this is an area
00:06:30where we're
00:06:30just going to disagree
00:06:32on one of those complicated
00:06:32areas in the budget.
00:06:33K through 12 funding
00:06:35under the House
00:06:36budget, districts
00:06:36will get $266 million
00:06:39more than in DeWine's budget.
00:06:39Is that correct?
00:06:41266, 200, I believe
00:06:41226 million more than they got
00:06:46in the current 2025 and per
00:06:46pupil funding as increase.
00:06:51The fair school funding plan
00:06:51is not going to go forward.
00:06:53And you described
00:06:54what you're doing
00:06:54as a bridge formula
00:06:56to take you to the next
00:06:56General Assembly.
00:06:58Are you moving to another
00:07:00formula in two years, or House
00:07:00Minority Leader
00:07:04Allison Russo
00:07:04said, you're just shifting
00:07:06the burden
00:07:06onto local communities.
00:07:08What's happening
00:07:08with that formula?
00:07:10Well,
00:07:10first of all, we're spending
00:07:11$16.5 billion
00:07:11on traditional public schools
00:07:15in the new biennium.
00:07:16That is 226 million
00:07:16more than they got in 2025.
00:07:20And we're not getting rid
00:07:20of the fair
00:07:21school funding formula
00:07:21in its entirety,
00:07:23but it is in their higher
00:07:23revised code
00:07:25that is often revised and new
00:07:26when it comes to school
00:07:26funding
00:07:27that is typically revised
00:07:27every two years.
00:07:29So cut
00:07:30Patterson is still kind of the
00:07:32bedrock that we started with.
00:07:34But what we've seen over
00:07:34the last few years
00:07:35is it's not really working
00:07:35in the manner it was intended.
00:07:38It's not accounting for these
00:07:38high growth districts.
00:07:41It's not accounting for,
00:07:41you know, fairly
00:07:43historic rates of property
00:07:43tax increase.
00:07:45And so under the old formula,
00:07:47as property values increase,
00:07:47the state share decreases.
00:07:50And so what you saw,
00:07:50and I think you saw this
00:07:52in the governor's
00:07:53budget, is a proposal
00:07:53where an awful lot of school
00:07:56districts
00:07:56were going to get a cut.
00:07:57You had some districts
00:07:57that were going to get
00:07:59an unusual amount of increase.
00:08:01And all we've really done in
00:08:01this budget
00:08:02is kind of take the, the,
00:08:02the losers and the winners
00:08:05and kind of collapse
00:08:05everybody towards the mean.
00:08:07Every single school district
00:08:07in Ohio
00:08:09is going to get a budget
00:08:10increase under this version
00:08:10of the budget,
00:08:12and we think
00:08:12that's a good place to be.
00:08:14Does that carry forward into
00:08:14the next General Assembly?
00:08:17I mean, I know that Speaker
00:08:17Matt Huffman has said
00:08:19you can't promise things
00:08:19for future lawmakers
00:08:22to take up, but
00:08:23like tax cuts stay in budgets
00:08:23beyond the current GA.
00:08:27What's going to happen
00:08:27going forward on this?
00:08:29Well, tax cuts
00:08:29are just like school funding.
00:08:31They are subject to revision
00:08:32any time
00:08:32it is a high revised code.
00:08:34So we are putting ourselves
00:08:34on a path
00:08:37towards a more sustainable way
00:08:37of funding public schools.
00:08:41I expect we'll have a similar
00:08:41conversation in two years.
00:08:44I expect that we will.
00:08:45You know, every year,
00:08:46generally, we give more money
00:08:46to our public schools,
00:08:48but we can't do it
00:08:48at these unsustainable levels
00:08:51as and folks have asked for,
00:08:51you know, the
00:08:53additional $1.8 billion,
00:08:53that's not sustainable.
00:08:56We don't have it.
00:08:57Ohioans are not going to
00:08:58support us
00:08:58raising taxes to cover that.
00:09:01And so,
00:09:01you know, giving more money
00:09:03to every public school
00:09:03district,
00:09:04is a good place to be.
00:09:06We understand
00:09:06it's budget season.
00:09:07And, you know,
00:09:07folks are not getting 100%
00:09:09of what they asked for.
00:09:10Almost nobody is, but we need
00:09:10to live within our means.
00:09:13That includes
00:09:13our public schools.
00:09:15One of the ways that,
00:09:16this becomes complicated
00:09:16is when you start
00:09:18talking about property
00:09:19tax changes,
00:09:19which there are several bills
00:09:21that would deal with property
00:09:21tax changes.
00:09:23And you've got a provision
00:09:25in this budget
00:09:25that would allow
00:09:25school districts to carry
00:09:27over 25% of their budgets,
00:09:27but if they go over that,
00:09:30then each county tax office
00:09:32would refund the overage
00:09:32to property taxpayers.
00:09:35You said that folks
00:09:36who pay a higher
00:09:37share of property tax
00:09:37get a higher share of benefit,
00:09:40but school districts say
00:09:41many of them
00:09:42that would take them
00:09:43into the red within their
00:09:43five year forecast.
00:09:45And it would force them
00:09:45to go to voters
00:09:47who don't want to pass levies.
00:09:48And Russo has said
00:09:48it's not real property
00:09:51tax reform or tax relief
00:09:51because there are
00:09:54bipartisan bill
00:09:54that would do that.
00:09:55So explain this 25% cap
00:09:55and what's it going to do
00:09:59to public school districts
00:10:00or right now, public school
00:10:00districts
00:10:02cumulatively
00:10:02in the state of Ohio
00:10:03are sitting on $10.5 billion
00:10:06in their operating accounts
00:10:06as an excess.
00:10:08We heard from a public school
00:10:08district today that had a 55%
00:10:11carryover balance.
00:10:12We think there should be
00:10:12a carryover balance.
00:10:15State has one,
00:10:15local governments have one.
00:10:17But 25% or less
00:10:17is is more than norm.
00:10:20And so when you have school
00:10:22districts
00:10:22collecting more property tax
00:10:24than they actually need
00:10:24to operate,
00:10:26that's money
00:10:26coming out of the pockets
00:10:27of our residents
00:10:27and into the bank account
00:10:29of the government school
00:10:29district.
00:10:31So, you know,
00:10:32we think that money
00:10:32is better off
00:10:33in the pockets
00:10:33of the residents.
00:10:35They're still going
00:10:35be able to have a carryover.
00:10:37They're still going to be able
00:10:37to have their levies.
00:10:39This is not include federal
00:10:39money that they receive.
00:10:41It does not include,
00:10:42you know, bond revenues
00:10:42that they may be receiving.
00:10:45This is just
00:10:45your operating account
00:10:47for the school district.
00:10:47How much can you carryover
00:10:49and when a, you know, 25% is
00:10:49to get a triple A bond rating.
00:10:52So we're letting folks
00:10:54carry over 25%
00:10:54maintain their bond rating.
00:10:57You know, we've not heard
00:10:57that kind of pushback yet.
00:10:59I mean, I understand
00:10:59you're quoting the minority
00:11:01leader, but,
00:11:01you know, that's our job.
00:11:03And, we believe that 25%
00:11:03very reasonable.
00:11:07And this is the quickest,
00:11:07most significant way
00:11:09to get real property
00:11:09tax relief
00:11:11to Ohioans in a timely manner
00:11:11without just simply shifting
00:11:15the burden
00:11:15from local taxpayers to every
00:11:15taxpayer in the state.
00:11:19So you have not heard pushback
00:11:19from county school districts
00:11:22or anybody at the school
00:11:22district level on this?
00:11:25Well, we just had our first,
00:11:27hearing on the budget
00:11:27this morning.
00:11:28I mean, there were, you know,
00:11:28two to 2 or 3 districts that,
00:11:33were complaining.
00:11:34But, you know,
00:11:34we looked up their balances
00:11:34in real time, 55%, 42%,
00:11:38schools should be able
00:11:38to take property tax
00:11:41to cover what they need,
00:11:41but not afford an
00:11:44an unusual amount
00:11:44beyond what is, necessary.
00:11:49The school districts,
00:11:49in your understanding, hoard
00:11:51some of that money,
00:11:51hold back some of that money.
00:11:53Because of the uncertainty
00:11:53of school funding in general.
00:11:56Well,
00:11:57they are subject to the same
00:11:57tier process that we are,
00:12:00you know, to say, well,
00:12:01we just have to continue
00:12:01to take more money
00:12:03from our taxpayers
00:12:03than we need.
00:12:05Planning for a rainy day six,
00:12:05seven, eight years from now.
00:12:08It's just not realistic.
00:12:09Let's talk
00:12:09a little bit about the $600
00:12:11million bond package
00:12:11for the new Brown
00:12:12Stadium and development
00:12:12that what's around it.
00:12:15It's a huge deal.
00:12:15It will be Ohio's
00:12:15first dome stadium.
00:12:17It will be half funded
00:12:17by the team's owners,
00:12:20the Haslam,
00:12:20who are billionaires.
00:12:21The expectation is
00:12:22it would generate
00:12:22a lot of events
00:12:24and a lot of activity,
00:12:24a lot of economic activity.
00:12:26You said the Browns have given
00:12:26what you call
00:12:28very reasonable metrics
00:12:29on what type of increased
00:12:29economic activity
00:12:31will essentially pay back
00:12:31the state
00:12:34for the cost of those 30 year
00:12:36bonds,
00:12:36which is about $1 billion.
00:12:38Over that 30 year period,
00:12:39the team has estimated $1.3
00:12:39billion
00:12:42more in revenue
00:12:42than it would cost
00:12:44the state to pay back
00:12:44those bonds.
00:12:46There was a 12 page
00:12:46presentation that was made
00:12:48to the House Arts, Athletics
00:12:48and Tourism Committee
00:12:52about that.
00:12:53It gave their total numbers,
00:12:53but there's no real breakdown
00:12:57on how much income tax,
00:12:57sales tax, whatever.
00:13:00Have you seen a breakdown
00:13:01on how much individual
00:13:01tax revenue from each
00:13:04pot will create
00:13:04that economic impact?
00:13:07I, I probably have
00:13:09I mean, I have seen
00:13:09all of their metrics and math
00:13:11and I've seen the 30 year
00:13:11chart.
00:13:13I mean, I think that
00:13:13what they're proposing
00:13:15is reasonable.
00:13:15I mean it
00:13:16you don't have to be
00:13:16an economic
00:13:18genius to understand that
00:13:18if you put the premier,
00:13:21entertainment venue
00:13:21in all of America
00:13:23in a great big open space
00:13:23just outside our,
00:13:25you know, one of our,
00:13:25our largest region,
00:13:27and you add retail, shopping,
00:13:27office space and a premier
00:13:31entertainment venue,
00:13:32you're going to have more
00:13:32economic activity.
00:13:33You're going to have
00:13:33more income tax,
00:13:35you're
00:13:35going to have more sales tax.
00:13:36And so,
00:13:37we do this
00:13:37all the time in deals across
00:13:39Ohio with, with tax increment
00:13:39financing tips, where we,
00:13:42we say that we're going
00:13:42to, keep the income generated
00:13:46from this project
00:13:46at the project site.
00:13:48We do that
00:13:48in every community in Ohio.
00:13:50And so we think this is
00:13:50just kind of a
00:13:51obviously
00:13:51a larger version of that,
00:13:53but it is consistent
00:13:54with how we have done things
00:13:54in the past.
00:13:56Ohio voters
00:13:56have authorized us for 30, 40,
00:13:5950 years to sell, revenue
00:13:59bonds to do capital projects.
00:14:04Now, typically
00:14:04every two years,
00:14:04we do a capital budget
00:14:06where we, you know, get that
00:14:06money back into the community.
00:14:09We do, you know, amphitheaters
00:14:09and Circleville and a splash
00:14:12pad and Wapa Canada
00:14:12and everything in between.
00:14:15This is just a bigger version
00:14:15of that.
00:14:17It's a selling bonds, doing
00:14:17a large community project.
00:14:20And I think that
00:14:20when the ribbon is cut
00:14:23and folks
00:14:23walk through the door
00:14:25and we see the activity
00:14:25activity that this drives,
00:14:27I think people are going to be
00:14:27happy that this is in Ohio.
00:14:29You're confident that it won't
00:14:30just take economic activity
00:14:30from downtown Cleveland
00:14:33or some other parts
00:14:33of the state
00:14:34and just rob them of that?
00:14:36I don't think so.
00:14:37I think when you look at what
00:14:37Indianapolis has been doing,
00:14:40they've been eating our lunch
00:14:40in terms of,
00:14:42entertainment venues
00:14:43and national events
00:14:43for almost 20 years.
00:14:46When you look at other venues
00:14:47that of this size
00:14:47that have occurred elsewhere.
00:14:50I, we think this is a rising
00:14:51tide is going to kind of lift
00:14:51a lot of boats.
00:14:52I think you're going
00:14:52to get events to Ohio
00:14:55that we're not
00:14:55getting currently.
00:14:56I think you're going
00:14:56to have an event space
00:14:56with a dome that, unlike the,
00:15:00you know, stadium on the lake,
00:15:00can be used year round.
00:15:03I think that is going
00:15:03to attract more events
00:15:05and be a driver of economic
00:15:05activity in that area.
00:15:08Has there been an analysis
00:15:08from the Office
00:15:10of Budget and Management
00:15:10or the Legislative Service
00:15:12Commission about those numbers
00:15:12that came from the Browns?
00:15:14Our staff is looking at all
00:15:14the numbers.
00:15:15I mean,
00:15:15I think we are digging in and,
00:15:17you know, doing our homework
00:15:17and double checking.
00:15:19But, you know, again,
00:15:19it's not,
00:15:23it's not much of a stretch
00:15:23to understand that when you go
00:15:25and now you add the premier,
00:15:25to a great big open site
00:15:28entertainment venue,
00:15:30that there is going to be an
00:15:30increased economic activity.
00:15:32But when all of the hassles
00:15:32pay for it all by themselves,
00:15:35well, they're paying for 1.2
00:15:35billion.
00:15:37That's the largest
00:15:37private investment,
00:15:38in the state's history.
00:15:40That is one
00:15:41that is a bigger
00:15:41private investment
00:15:42than most deals of this kind.
00:15:44I, you know, I don't know
00:15:44all their finances,
00:15:47but I assume even billionaires
00:15:47at some point
00:15:49have a bit of a limit of what,
00:15:50what you can do in a project.
00:15:52And so, this is the norm
00:15:52across the country.
00:15:55If I was king for a day, maybe
00:15:56there would be no stadium
00:15:56deals in any state.
00:15:58But if we don't do this
00:15:58in Ohio,
00:16:00our competitors
00:16:00certainly would.
00:16:01If you look at other states
00:16:01of our size, our type,
00:16:05this is the norm.
00:16:06Las Vegas
00:16:06is the most recent stadium.
00:16:08Public involvement
00:16:08in that stadium was vastly
00:16:10higher than what
00:16:10is being proposed for Ohio.
00:16:12Tennessee is a,
00:16:13you know, a red state
00:16:14that a lot of our members
00:16:14of our caucus,
00:16:16like to take a look at and,
00:16:16you know, kind of
00:16:19comparing ideas.
00:16:20I believe
00:16:20they've got a proposed,
00:16:22stadium
00:16:22that would be, you know, in
00:16:24excess of $1.2 billion
00:16:24in taxpayer participation.
00:16:28So we're talking
00:16:28about roughly half
00:16:29of that investment
00:16:29for a site here in Ohio.
00:16:32This is this is kind of the
00:16:32price of having one of these,
00:16:36Premier sites that,
00:16:36you know, I've lived in Ohio
00:16:38my entire life,
00:16:40and I've heard
00:16:40from some people, not myself.
00:16:42You know, there's
00:16:42nothing to do in Ohio.
00:16:44What are we doing to keep kids
00:16:44here?
00:16:45What are we doing
00:16:45for young people?
00:16:47What do we do?
00:16:48Like why do other states have
00:16:48things that we don't have?
00:16:51Well, now, here we are.
00:16:52We have a billionaire
00:16:52who's saying,
00:16:53I want to put in, you know,
00:16:53$1.2 billion of my own money.
00:16:56I'm asking for essentially
00:16:56a $600
00:16:58million loan from the state.
00:17:00And we have folks
00:17:00who are saying, well, no,
00:17:01I don't want those.
00:17:01I don't want that anymore.
00:17:04I think we're going to win.
00:17:05This is done.
00:17:07People are going to be happy
00:17:07it's here.
00:17:08And I think it's going to be
00:17:08a good thing for the state.
00:17:09You have Cog County Executive
00:17:11Chris Ronayne and Cleveland
00:17:11Mayor Justin Bibb,
00:17:12who both oppose the project,
00:17:12and Brook Park.
00:17:15They've said
00:17:15that the team's estimates
00:17:16hinge on prices
00:17:16per ticket for games
00:17:19going to $800 a ticket
00:17:19over 30 years,
00:17:22and for every game
00:17:22to be sold out
00:17:23for every parking place
00:17:23to be sold out.
00:17:25Are those reasonable
00:17:25estimates in your view?
00:17:28That's not my understanding
00:17:28of how they're
00:17:29calculating their math,
00:17:29and I'm not surprised
00:17:31that opponents of the project
00:17:31may have,
00:17:33some,
00:17:33some different arguments
00:17:34and metrics
00:17:34that they're trying to use.
00:17:36The locals will decide
00:17:36what they want to do.
00:17:39I think the state has made
00:17:39a determination
00:17:40that this is a project worth
00:17:40doing in this budget.
00:17:42Does the state bond package
00:17:42go through no matter
00:17:45whether the locals do it
00:17:45or not? It does.
00:17:47What happens if the locals
00:17:47don't come forward?
00:17:49What happens to those bonds?
00:17:51Well, the well, I would say
00:17:54the the legislation
00:17:54would authorize us
00:17:57to sell bonds regardless
00:17:57of whether the locals
00:17:59participate,
00:17:59whether we actually would
00:18:01I mean, would be a question
00:18:01for, for down the road.
00:18:04I mean,
00:18:04I think it would determine on
00:18:05whether obviously
00:18:05the project's going to happen.
00:18:07I think if the if the
00:18:07if the Browns say,
00:18:11we can make this project work
00:18:12without local participation,
00:18:13then I think the state would
00:18:13still be involved.
00:18:16If for some reason that the
00:18:16lack of local participation
00:18:19is a problem
00:18:20for the project,
00:18:20I mean, we're not going to
00:18:21sell bonds or a project
00:18:21that doesn't exist.
00:18:24The two leading Republican
00:18:24candidates for governor, Vivek
00:18:26Ramaswamy
00:18:26and Dave Yost, have both said
00:18:27they want Ohio
00:18:27to go to zero income tax.
00:18:29Many Republicans
00:18:29feel that way.
00:18:31You had a tweet last year
00:18:31when you talked
00:18:32about an aggressive move
00:18:32toward eliminating the tax,
00:18:36which you said should be done
00:18:36by reining in state spending.
00:18:39If there are income taxes
00:18:39in this revenue mix, though,
00:18:42wouldn't going to zero
00:18:42or cutting the income tax,
00:18:45wouldn't
00:18:45that dramatically affect
00:18:47the revenues that the state
00:18:47would reap from this project?
00:18:51Well,
00:18:51any any elimination
00:18:51of the income tax
00:18:53unless there is a significant
00:18:53adjustment to spending
00:18:56is going to work, would
00:18:56require adjustments elsewhere.
00:18:59I mean, other states that
00:18:59have gone to a 0% income tax,
00:19:03they didn't find a cheaper way
00:19:03to pay for roads.
00:19:06They just collect the same
00:19:07amount of revenue
00:19:07through different pots.
00:19:09And I expect that if we
00:19:10if we got to that point,
00:19:10eventually
00:19:11it would be
00:19:11a similar thing in Ohio.
00:19:13So you would have to go back
00:19:14to the stadium project
00:19:14and redo the numbers.
00:19:18No, I'm saying
00:19:19I think that
00:19:19if you were actually
00:19:20going
00:19:20to eliminate the income tax,
00:19:22it's entirely likely that
00:19:23there would be adjustments
00:19:23either to,
00:19:25you know, property tax,
00:19:26sales tax,
00:19:26you know, some other,
00:19:28you know, ticket tax
00:19:28or there would be
00:19:29some other offsetting,
00:19:29adjustment made that would
00:19:32that would raise revenue
00:19:32from the project is the same.
00:19:35That brings me
00:19:35the question of
00:19:35what is the mechanism
00:19:37to make sure that the state
00:19:37is made
00:19:38whole with the revenue
00:19:38doesn't come in?
00:19:40Well, first of all, the
00:19:40the team is depositing
00:19:44a $38 million bond
00:19:44at the beginning
00:19:47that will be invested
00:19:47and grow over time.
00:19:49The projections are
00:19:49that invest that
00:19:51that that compounding
00:19:52of interest would be about 150
00:19:52to $200 million,
00:19:55by the end of the 30 years.
00:19:57So, we feel good
00:19:57about the projections
00:20:00on what the increased tax
00:20:00revenue to the state would be.
00:20:03That bond is there
00:20:03as a backstop, though,
00:20:04if we're off by, you know, 50,
00:20:04100 hundred and $50 million,
00:20:08the team is putting up
00:20:08a collateral security
00:20:11to make sure that we could
00:20:11make the taxpayers hole.
00:20:13In any event,
00:20:14there are some other things
00:20:14in the House budget
00:20:16that Democrats disagree with,
00:20:16which is to be expected
00:20:18so much
00:20:19that Alice
00:20:20LaRusso said that there's
00:20:21no one
00:20:21in the Democratic caucus
00:20:22who would vote for this budget
00:20:22right now.
00:20:23Is that okay with you?
00:20:24Is there room for compromise
00:20:24as far as you're concerned?
00:20:27Well, look, we would always
00:20:28you know, anybody
00:20:28who votes against this budget
00:20:30is voting against more money
00:20:30for public schools
00:20:32or voting against property
00:20:32tax relief.
00:20:34They're voting against
00:20:34an increase
00:20:35of funding
00:20:35for higher education.
00:20:37They're voting against a lot
00:20:37of good government reforms.
00:20:40People have to make their own
00:20:40decision on the floor about,
00:20:43how they want to proceed.
00:20:44But, you know, we have a 65,
00:20:44member Republican caucus,
00:20:48and we could pass a bill,
00:20:49as we're constitutionally
00:20:50required to do,
00:20:50probably without,
00:20:53the support
00:20:53of the other party.
00:20:55I'd like to
00:20:55have their support,
00:20:56but I think we've, you know,
00:20:57there's
00:20:57been an appetite in our caucus
00:20:59to have a more
00:20:59Republican budget.
00:21:00I think for quite a while.
00:21:02I think the, the,
00:21:02you know, the
00:21:03the strength
00:21:03of the last two years,
00:21:05I think there was a lot
00:21:06of dissatisfaction
00:21:06in our caucus about,
00:21:08you know, what we what we did
00:21:08and didn't get in that budget
00:21:11based on the kind of, power
00:21:13sharing arrangement
00:21:13that there was.
00:21:14And so,
00:21:15we would love to have
00:21:15all the votes
00:21:17that we possibly can,
00:21:18but this is going to be
00:21:18a fiscally conservative,
00:21:22Republican budget.
00:21:23But this is the first budget
00:21:23in, I think, seven years,
00:21:25seven cycles. That doesn't
00:21:25include an income tax cut.
00:21:29Yeah.
00:21:29I think this is, Santa Claus
00:21:29has gone home.
00:21:32I mean, there is no more
00:21:32federal money.
00:21:34There is no more CARES
00:21:34act. Arpa.
00:21:36You know, whatever
00:21:37other acronym
00:21:37the federal government
00:21:38put on it,
00:21:39we've had for several budget
00:21:39cycles,
00:21:41frankly, a lot of money
00:21:41from the federal government
00:21:43that,
00:21:43you know, went out the door
00:21:46and created programs
00:21:46and is now gone.
00:21:48And so we're back to
00:21:48we're back to normal.
00:21:50We're back to a regular order
00:21:50here.
00:21:52And we have to live
00:21:52within our means,
00:21:53unlike our friends
00:21:53in Washington, DC.
00:21:55And so, there is, you know,
00:21:55necessarily going to be cuts
00:21:59which we are making
00:21:59in this budget and,
00:22:01we're going to be realistic
00:22:01about the fact
00:22:04that we probably,
00:22:04in this budget environment,
00:22:06probably can't do an income
00:22:06tax cut. We have cut.
00:22:08So we have cut it to the point
00:22:10that we are competitive with
00:22:10all of our neighboring states.
00:22:13We are not hearing
00:22:13the same kind of concerns
00:22:14from our residents
00:22:14or businesses,
00:22:16that our income tax
00:22:17is a hindrance
00:22:17to economic development or,
00:22:20you know, people's
00:22:20desire to live here.
00:22:21I think people are much
00:22:21more concerned
00:22:23about property tax relief.
00:22:24this budget is emphasizing,
00:22:24That's why
00:22:26you know, immediate,
00:22:26swift property tax relief
00:22:28through the county Budget
00:22:28Commission process.
00:22:31And I think if we provide
00:22:31residents property tax relief,
00:22:33I think that's what
00:22:33they're more interested in
00:22:34right now than the income tax.
00:22:36And one final question.
00:22:36You said we're back to normal.
00:22:38One of the things
00:22:38that's not back to normal
00:22:40is that a ban on food
00:22:40banks, food banks
00:22:41got a cut in governor
00:22:41Mike DeWine budget.
00:22:44I don't believe that's been
00:22:44restored in the House budget.
00:22:46There are folks
00:22:46who are going to say,
00:22:48why not help food banks?
00:22:50Why not help people who are in
00:22:50need instead of, say,
00:22:53doing the $600 million
00:22:53in bonds for the Brown state?
00:22:56Well, first of all,
00:22:57the bonding issue
00:22:57is entirely separate
00:22:59from our general revenue
00:22:59fund spending. Okay?
00:23:02Our capital budget does
00:23:03not affect what we spend on
00:23:03any other state obligations.
00:23:06So those are
00:23:06those are apples and oranges.
00:23:08The with regard to the food
00:23:08banks, they are getting
00:23:11$22.5 million in each year
00:23:11from the state budget.
00:23:14They're not getting
00:23:16the full amount
00:23:16they asked for.
00:23:17Again, nobody really is
00:23:17in this budget.
00:23:19We have 4% unemployment
00:23:19in the state.
00:23:22We have a huge list of open
00:23:23jobs available
00:23:23for people to go fill.
00:23:25I hope people do.
00:23:26We think that should drive
00:23:28the demand for the food banks
00:23:28down.
00:23:29And, we are funding food
00:23:29banks like we are everyone
00:23:33to the capacity that we can.
00:23:35But we're not going to,
00:23:35live outside our means.
00:23:38A note in response
00:23:39from the Ohio Association
00:23:39of Food Banks.
00:23:41They surveyed their customers
00:23:41last year
00:23:44and found just over half
00:23:44had a member of the household
00:23:47who was working.
00:23:48Those who weren't.
00:23:4958% reported
00:23:49they were too disabled
00:23:51or sick, and nearly
00:23:5144% said they were retired.
00:23:55The food banks have modified
00:23:55their request in the budget,
00:23:58now asking for around
00:23:59$10 million more, or nearly
00:23:59$29.5 million a year.
00:24:04Executive Director
00:24:04Jory Novotny said
00:24:06it won't provide an adequate
00:24:06emergency response,
00:24:09but it will be meaningful
00:24:09and is vitally necessary
00:24:12to stop hunger and support
00:24:12Ohio agriculture.
00:24:15Speaker Matt Hoffman says
00:24:15the plan is for a full floor
00:24:18vote on the House
00:24:18budget on Wednesday.
00:24:21By the way, DeWine signed the
00:24:21$11.5 billion transportation
00:24:24budget right on the March 31st
00:24:24deadline, with no vetoes.
00:24:28It had passed
00:24:28both chambers unanimously.
00:24:31But he had been urged
00:24:31to veto provisions
00:24:33requiring proof of citizenship
00:24:35to register to vote and Bureau
00:24:35of Motor Vehicles offices
00:24:38and a new leadership position
00:24:40and pay raise for Assistant
00:24:40Speaker Pro Tem Phil Plummer.
00:24:44And that is it for this week
00:24:44for my colleagues
00:24:46at the statehouse News
00:24:46Bureau of Ohio Public Media.
00:24:48Thanks for watching.
00:24:49Please check out our website
00:24:49at State News Corp
00:24:52or find us online by searching
00:24:52State of Ohio Show.
00:24:55We'll keep you up to date
00:24:55via Ohio State House alerts.
00:24:58If you register through this
00:24:58QR code, text state
00:25:02news to this number
00:25:02or go to this website.
00:25:05You can also hear more
00:25:05from my colleagues
00:25:07Joe Ingles and Sarah Donaldson
00:25:07and me on our podcast,
00:25:09The Ohio State House
00:25:09scoop every Monday morning.
00:25:13Thanks for watching
00:25:13and please join us again
00:25:14next time
00:25:14for the state of Ohio.
00:26:05Just.
00:26:06Support
00:26:06for the Statehouse News
00:26:08Bureau
00:26:08comes from Medical Mutual,
00:26:09dedicated to the health
00:26:09and well-being of Ohioans,
00:26:12offering health insurance
00:26:12plans, as well as dental,
00:26:15vision and wellness programs
00:26:15to help people
00:26:17achieve their goals
00:26:17and remain healthy.
00:26:19More at Med mutual.com.
00:26:21The law offices of Porter,
00:26:21right, Morris and Arthur LLP.
00:26:24Porter Wright is dedicated
00:26:24to bringing inspired legal
00:26:27outcomes to the Ohio business
00:26:27community.
00:26:30More at porterwright.com.
00:26:31Porter Wright
00:26:31inspired Every day
00:26:34in Ohio Education Association,
00:26:34representing 120,000
00:26:37educators who are united
00:26:37in their mission
00:26:39to create the excellent
00:26:39public schools.
00:26:41Every child
00:26:41deserves more at OHEA.org.
Note : Transcripts are compiled from uncorrected captions