Archive
 
Video Library
Store
 
Online StoreShopping Cart
About
 
Program DirectoryBroadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAbout the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsAffiliatesJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
ARCHIVESTOREABOUT
 
Video Library
 
 
Online Store Shopping Cart
 
 
Program Directory Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Affiliates Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Supreme Court of Ohio - Case Nos. 2017-1715 & 2017-1716 State v. Bishop Expand
 
 
July 18, 2018
07-18-2018
185 Views
Share Download Buy
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 720p Video
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
State of Ohio v. Dustin Bishop, Case Nos. 2017-1715 and 2017-1716
Second District Court of Appeals (Montgomery County)

ISSUE: When a criminal defendant on post-release control for a prior felony appears before a trial court to plead guilty to a new felony, must the trial court inform the defendant that it can terminate the defendant's post-release control and impose a consecutive prison sentence for the post-release control violation?

BACKGROUND:
A Montgomery County grand jury indicted Dustin Bishop in December 2016 for possession of heroin and drug paraphernalia. Based on a plea agreement, Bishop pled guilty to drug possession, and the state agreed to dismiss the drug paraphernalia count. The trial court accepted the plea.
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2017-1715
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2017-1715
Case Information For Case #2017-1716
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2017-1716
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2022 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.