Archive
 
Video Library
Broadcast
 
Broadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAffiliatesDaily Streaming Schedule
About
 
About the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
ARCHIVEBROADCASTABOUT
Total Views 70,754,313
Total Views 70,754,313
Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator Affiliates Daily Streaming Schedule
 
 
About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Supreme Court of Ohio - Case No. 2023-0472 Disciplinary Counsel v. Hunter Expand
 
 
June 28, 2023
06-28-2023
503 Views
Audio Only Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 480p VideoDownload 720p VideoDownload 1080p VideoDownload Audio (mp3)
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
Juvenile Judge Convicted of Felony Contests Proposed Suspension
Disciplinary Counsel v. Tracie M. Hunter, Case No. 2023-0472
Hamilton County

Former Hamilton County Juvenile Judge Tracie Hunter was convicted in 2014 of a felony and served a jail sentence. She now contests a proposed indefinite suspension from the practice of law based on the conviction, which she is still challenging.

The Board of Professional Conduct has recommended to the Supreme Court of Ohio that Hunter be indefinitely suspended and given credit for time served during an interim suspension. Hunter has been suspended since October 2014, the month in which she was convicted of having unlawful interest in a public contract.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel charged Hunter with violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct and stated that every judge who committed a felony while in office was either disbarred or indefinitely suspended. The disciplinary counsel said it delayed filing charges against Hunter with the board for eight years, until both state and federal courts rejected appeals of Hunter's conviction.

The disciplinary counsel argues the indefinite suspension is appropriate for Hunter's actions. Hunter counters that she didn't violate the law though she was convicted and that the board received no proof during the disciplinary proceedings that she broke any conduct rules. Hunter's objection to the board recommendation triggered an oral argument before the Supreme Court.
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2023-0472
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2023-0472
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2023 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.