Archive
 
Video Library
Broadcast
 
Broadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAffiliatesDaily Streaming Schedule
About
 
About the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
ARCHIVEBROADCASTABOUT
Total Views 88,159,272
Total Views 88,159,272
Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator Affiliates Daily Streaming Schedule
 
 
About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Case No. 2011-1925 State of Ohio v. Alfred Jackson III Expand
 
 
September 11, 2012
09-11-2012
2,996 Views
Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 360p VideoDownload 720p Video
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
Is Drug Trafficking Indictment Invalid If It Identifies Category, But Omits Specific Drug Defendant Is Charged With Selling?

State of Ohio v. Alfred Jackson III , Case no. 2011-1925

Ninth District Court of Appeals (Lorain County)

ISSUE: Is a grand jury indictment for the crime of drug trafficking fatally defective if it alleges that the defendant sold or offered for sale a "Schedule I or II controlled substance" but does not name the specific drug or drugs in which the defendant is accused of trafficking?
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2011-1925
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2011-1925
Opinion Summary For Case #2011-1925
 
Tags
Ohio GovernmentJudicial BranchSupreme Court of Ohio
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2025 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.