Archive
 
Video Library
Broadcast
 
Broadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAffiliatesDaily Streaming Schedule
About
 
About the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
ARCHIVEBROADCASTABOUT
Total Views 87,291,441
Total Views 87,291,441
Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator Affiliates Daily Streaming Schedule
 
 
About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Case No. 2011-0599 State of Ohio v. Donald Eafford (Mp3) Expand
 
 
January 17, 2012
01-17-2012
711 Views
Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download File
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Description
When Jury Verdict Form Does Not Identify Drug Possessed by Defendant, Is Court Limited to Misdemeanor Sentence?

Or May Court Reference Indictment, Other Parts of Record to Determine Level of Offense?

State of Ohio v. Donald Eafford, Case no. 2011-0599

8th District Court of Appeals (Cuyahoga County)

ISSUE: When the verdict form returned by a jury finds a defendant guilty of drug possession but does not identify the drug he possessed, must the trial court sentence the defendant based on the least serious level of that offense, or may the court rely on information in the indictment, jury instructions and other parts of the trial record to establish what drug the defendant possessed, and sentence him accordingly?
Tags
Ohio GovernmentJudicial BranchSupreme Court of Ohio
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2025 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.