In re application of the Dayton Power and Light Company for administration of the significantly excessive earnings test et al., Case No. 2021-1473
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
ISSUES:
- Did the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) act unreasonably and unlawfully when it declined to order refunds to consumers from an electric utility company found to have excessive earnings?
- Did the PUCO approve a rate stabilization charge that was not permitted under state law and contrary to decisions from the Supreme Court of Ohio?
- Did the PUCO have evidence to support the continuation of a rate stabilization charge as part of approving a settlement with an electric company?