Archive
Broadcast
About
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
Program Directory
Supreme Court of Ohio - Case No. 2021-1473 In re Application of Dayton Power & Light Co.
Was PUCO Decision That No Refund Was Due to Utility Customers Lawful?
In re Application of the Dayton Power and Light Company, Case No. 2021-1473
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
ISSUES:
- Did the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) act unreasonably and unlawfully when it didn't require an electric utility to return "significantly excessive earnings" to customers?
- Did the PUCO abuse its discretion when it approved a settlement that allowed continued charges on customers for rate stabilization?
- Was the PUCO approval of the rate stabilization charge unlawful because it violates statute and is contrary to Ohio Supreme Court precedent?
In re Application of the Dayton Power and Light Company, Case No. 2021-1473
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
ISSUES:
- Did the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) act unreasonably and unlawfully when it didn't require an electric utility to return "significantly excessive earnings" to customers?
- Did the PUCO abuse its discretion when it approved a settlement that allowed continued charges on customers for rate stabilization?
- Was the PUCO approval of the rate stabilization charge unlawful because it violates statute and is contrary to Ohio Supreme Court precedent?
April 2, 2025