Archive
 
Video Library
Broadcast
 
Broadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAffiliatesDaily Streaming Schedule
About
 
About the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
ARCHIVEBROADCASTABOUT
 
Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator Affiliates Daily Streaming Schedule
 
 
About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Supreme Court of Ohio - Case No. 2023-0180 Disciplinary Counsel v. Warner Expand
 
 
May 16, 2023
05-16-2023
205 Views
Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 480p VideoDownload 720p VideoDownload 1080p Video
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
Disciplinary Counsel v. Jason D. Warner, Case No. 2023-0180
Marion County

Jason Warner was elected in 2018 as a Marion County Common Pleas judge. In June 2020, Warner and his wife, Julie, were in an auto accident. The Warners were driving home and didn't yield to an oncoming vehicle, and the cars collided. The Warners left the accident scene, where the other driver was seriously injured, and didn't report the accident until the next day.

Then-Judge Warner was convicted in March 2021 of complicity for leaving an accident scene and complicity to tampering with evidence. He was sentenced to two years in prison and is currently incarcerated. His wife was also convicted for similar offenses.

Following his conviction, the Supreme Court of Ohio placed the judge on an interim suspension. He resigned from the bench a few months later. The Board of Professional Conduct recommends that the former judge be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. The board opposes any credit for the time he has been suspended on the interim basis.

The former judge believes the panel that reviewed the disciplinary case didn't give the board all the relevant and undisputed evidence and that he should receive a lesser sanction. Because he objects to the board recommendations, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear his case during oral arguments.
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2023-0180
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2023-0180
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2023 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.