Archive
 
Video Library
Broadcast
 
Broadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAffiliatesDaily Streaming Schedule
About
 
About the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
ARCHIVEBROADCASTABOUT
Total Views 88,117,259
Total Views 88,117,259
Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator Affiliates Daily Streaming Schedule
 
 
About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Supreme Court of Ohio - Case No. 2022-1515 Disciplinary Counsel v. Gaul Expand
 
 
April 18, 2023
04-18-2023
609 Views
Audio Only Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 480p VideoDownload 720p VideoDownload 1080p VideoDownload Audio (mp3)
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
Disciplinary Counsel v. Judge Daniel Gaul, Case No. 2022-1515
Cuyahoga County

The Board of Professional Conduct recommends a one-year suspension for Judge Daniel Gaul of the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court. The board found 30 acts of misconduct in a five-year period by Judge Gaul. The board determined he violated the constitutional rights of several criminal defendants, incarcerated people improperly, used racially charged terms to refer to Black people, and threatened and belittled people in his courtroom.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel, which investigated the allegations, recommended a two-year suspension with one year stayed. But the office supports the board's proposed discipline, stating that the term achieves the purposes of the judicial disciplinary process.

Judge Gaul, who was appointed to the court in 1991 and has been reelected six times, has objected to the board findings and suggested sanction. He acknowledges misconduct but argues for a stay of the one-year suspension. Because he objected to the board conclusions, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear the case during oral arguments.
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2022-1515
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2022-1515
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2025 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.