Archive
 
Video Library
Broadcast
 
Broadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAffiliatesDaily Streaming Schedule
About
 
About the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
ARCHIVEBROADCASTABOUT
Total Views 91,260,337
Total Views 91,260,337
Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator Affiliates Daily Streaming Schedule
 
 
About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Supreme Court of Ohio - Case No. 2019-0621 In re M.H. Expand
 
 
April 29, 2020
04-29-2020
147 Views
Audio Only Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 480p VideoDownload 720p VideoDownload 1080p VideoDownload Audio (mp3)
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
In re M.H., Case No. 2019-0621
Eighth District Court of Appeals (Cuyahoga County)

ISSUES:
- Even when a government social worker isn't required to give Miranda warnings, is a child's statement involuntary and a violation of due process?
- Does a child feel free to leave when the child is driven by a parent to a government agency for questioning, separated from that parent, and questioned in a private room without being told he or she is free to leave or to not cooperate?
- Must a child-suspect be read Miranda warnings when questioned by a social worker exercising the statutory duty to investigate child-abuse allegations and who does so cooperatively with police on a regular and institutional basis?
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2019-0621
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2019-0621
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2025 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.