Archive
 
Video Library
Broadcast
 
Broadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAffiliatesDaily Streaming Schedule
About
 
About the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
ARCHIVEBROADCASTABOUT
Total Views 87,282,631
Total Views 87,282,631
Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator Affiliates Daily Streaming Schedule
 
 
About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Supreme Court of Ohio - Case No. 2016-1255 State v. Pountney Expand
 
 
September 13, 2017
09-13-2017
244 Views
Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 720p Video
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
State of Ohio v. Mark H. Pountney, Case No. 2016-1255
Eighth District Court of Appeals (Cuyahoga County)

ISSUE: Because there is no "usual dosage range" for fentanyl, may prosecutors use the dosage range for morphine specified in a standard pharmaceutical reference manual to establish a bulk amount for fentanyl when considering an illegal drug possession charge?
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2016-1255
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2016-1255
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2025 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.