Archive
 
Video Library
Broadcast
 
Broadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAffiliatesDaily Streaming Schedule
About
 
About the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
ARCHIVEBROADCASTABOUT
Total Views 88,099,563
Total Views 88,099,563
Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator Affiliates Daily Streaming Schedule
 
 
About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Supreme Court of Ohio - Case No. 2014-0978 Boone Coleman Construction, Inc. v. Village of Piketon, Ohio Expand
 
 
June 9, 2015
06-09-2015
2,238 Views
Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 360p VideoDownload 720p Video
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
Did Appellate Court Decision Essentially Rewrite Construction Contract's Application of Liquidated-Damages Clause?

Village of Piketon, Ohio v. Boone Coleman Construction, Inc., Case No. 2014-0978

Fourth District Court of Appeals (Pike)

ISSUES:

- Must a court analyze a liquidated-damages provision of a construction contract prospectively, based on the per-diem amount of the liquidated damages at the time the contract was executed? Or must the court analyze such a contract retrospectively, based on the total, actual liquidated damages that accrue?

- Are liquidated damages a penalty because no proof of actual damages is required to enforce a contract's liquidated-damages clause?
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2014-0978
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2014-0978
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2025 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.