Archive
 
Video Library
Broadcast
 
Broadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAffiliatesDaily Streaming Schedule
About
 
About the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
ARCHIVEBROADCASTABOUT
Total Views 87,659,485
Total Views 87,659,485
Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator Affiliates Daily Streaming Schedule
 
 
About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Supreme Court of Ohio - Case No. 2014-0358 City of Cleveland v. Janine Lycan et al Expand
 
 
March 11, 2015
03-11-2015
1,162 Views
Audio Only Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 360p VideoDownload 480p VideoDownload 720p VideoDownload 1080p VideoDownload Audio (mp3)
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
Are Vehicle Lessees Who Didn't Appeal Traffic-Camera Tickets Prohibited from Filing Class Action?

City of Cleveland v. Janine Lycan et al., Case No. 2014-0358

Eighth District Court of Appeals (Cuyahoga County)

ISSUE: Are individuals who received citations for traffic violations recorded by Cleveland's automated camera system and who didn't appeal their citations barred by res judicata from later filing a class-action lawsuit that the city was unjustly enriched by the citations?
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2014-0358
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2014-0358
Opinion Summary For Case #2014-0358
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2025 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.