In the Matter of the Review of the Alternative Energy Rider Contained in the Tariffs of Ohio Edison Company, The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, and The Toledo Edison Company, Case No. 2013-2026
Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
- Did the order issued by the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) in this case unlawfully require the utility to refund collected monies and mandate impermissible retroactive ratemaking?
- Was the PUCO's order against the manifest weight of the evidence?
- Did the PUCO's order unreasonably interpret Ohio law?