Archive
 
Video Library
Broadcast
 
Broadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAffiliatesDaily Streaming Schedule
About
 
About the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
ARCHIVEBROADCASTABOUT
Total Views 91,783,285
Total Views 91,783,285
Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator Affiliates Daily Streaming Schedule
 
 
About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Case No. 2018-0705 State v. Allen Expand
 
 
May 8, 2019
05-08-2019
102 Views
Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 480p VideoDownload 720p VideoDownload 1080p Video
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
State of Ohio v. Zachary C. Allen, Case No. 2018-0705
Tenth District Court of Appeals (Franklin County)

ISSUES:
- Is a bank that cashes a forged check and suffers a loss a "victim" under R.C. 2929.18?
- If a bank becomes a victim by cashing a forged check, can the defendant be convicted of forgery be ordered to pay restitution to the bank?

BACKGROUND:
In August 2016, Zachary Allen was indicted in Franklin County for seven counts of forgery and seven counts of possession of criminal tools. Allen cashed seven checks that he knew were counterfeit at four different banks. The checks were drawn from the accounts of two apartment complexes and one flooring service.
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2018-0705
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2018-0705
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2025 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.