Archive
 
Video Library
Store
 
Online StoreShopping Cart
About
 
Program DirectoryBroadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAbout the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsAffiliatesJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
ARCHIVESTOREABOUT
 
Video Library
 
 
Online Store Shopping Cart
 
 
Program Directory Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Affiliates Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Case No. 2013-1619 State of Ohio v. Matthew T. Mole Expand
 
 
July 9, 2014
07-09-2014
2,315 Views
Audio Only Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 360p VideoDownload 480p VideoDownload 720p VideoDownload 1080p VideoDownload Audio (mp3)
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
Does Law Prohibiting Sex Between Peace Officers and Minors Violate Equal Protection Rights?

State of Ohio v. Matthew T. Mole, Case No. 2013-1619

Eighth District Court of Appeals (Cuyahoga County)

ISSUE: Is R.C. 2907.03(A)(13), which prohibits sex between peace officers and minors, a violation of equal protection rights guaranteed by the U.S. and Ohio constitutions?
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2013-1619
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2013-1619
 
Tags
Ohio GovernmentJudicial BranchSupreme Court of OhioUnconstitutionalAs AppliedOn Its FaceSexual ContactMinorPeace OfficerPolice OfficerEqual Protection
 
Markers Transcript
 
00:00:37 Daniel Van for the state
00:13:04 Richard Perez for Matthew Mole
00:27:01 Michael Hendershot for amicus curiae Ohio Attorney General on behalf of the state
There is no transcript for this video.
Note : Transcripts are compiled from uncorrected captions
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2023 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.