Archive
 
Video Library
Broadcast
 
Broadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAffiliatesDaily Streaming Schedule
About
 
About the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
ARCHIVEBROADCASTABOUT
Total Views 87,658,033
Total Views 87,658,033
Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator Affiliates Daily Streaming Schedule
 
 
About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Case No. 2013-0945 State of Ohio ex rel. The Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hon. Michael J. Sage et al. Expand
 
 
May 28, 2014
05-28-2014
5,392 Views
Audio Only Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 360p VideoDownload 480p VideoDownload 720p VideoDownload 1080p VideoDownload Audio (mp3)
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
Is Outbound Call Made by 911 Operator Public Record?

State of Ohio ex rel. The Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hon. Michael J. Sage et al., Case no. 2013-0945

Twelfth District Court of Appeals (Butler County)

ISSUES:

From Michael Gmoser, Butler County prosecuting attorney, and Butler County Common Pleas Judge Michael J. Sage on appeal:

When a 911 dispatcher makes an outbound call to a residence following up on an inbound call that was disconnected, is the outbound call subject to disclosure under the Ohio Public Records Act?

Did a protective order issued by a court prohibiting the release of the outbound call to the media meet the requirements of U.S. Supreme Court and Ohio Supreme Court precedent?

Is the Ohio Supreme Court's ruling (in State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton Cty.) that 911 calls are inherently public records outdated and in need of reversal or modification?

Were statutory damages properly awarded to the media outlet?

From the Cincinnati Enquirer on cross-appeal:

Did the trial judge improperly rule on the prosecuting attorney's motion for a protective order?

Was the newspaper entitled to attorney's fees?
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2013-0945
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2013-0945
Opinion Summary For Case #2013-0945
 
Tags
Ohio GovernmentJudicial BranchSupreme Court of OhioVoir DireVenueReasonable AlternativesProsecutorEvidenceCrawfordDavisTestimonyConfessionMurderImpartial TrialSixth Amendment
 
Markers Transcript
 
00:00:45 Michael Oster for Hon. Michael J. Sage, Judge, Butler County Court of Common Pleas & Michael Gmoser, Butler County Prosecutor
00:23:23 John Greiner for the Cincinnati Enquirer
00:41:45 Summation: Michael Oster for Hon. Michael J. Sage, Judge, Butler County Court of Common Pleas & Michael Gmoser, Butler County Prosecutor
00:45:17 Summation: John Greiner for the Cincinnati Enquirer
There is no transcript for this video.
Note : Transcripts are compiled from uncorrected captions
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2025 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.