Archive
 
Video Library
Broadcast
 
Broadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAffiliatesDaily Streaming Schedule
About
 
About the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
ARCHIVEBROADCASTABOUT
Total Views 87,357,719
Total Views 87,357,719
Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator Affiliates Daily Streaming Schedule
 
 
About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Case No. 2011-0202 State of Ohio v. Eric Qualls (Mp3) Expand
 
 
October 5, 2011
10-05-2011
729 Views
Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download File
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Description
Can Omission of Postrelease Control from Court's Journal be Remedied by Later 'Nunc pro Tunc' Entry?

When Defendant Was Orally Notified of Requirement at Sentencing Hearing

State of Ohio v. Eric Qualls, Case no. 2011-0202

4th District Court of Appeals (Meigs County)

ISSUE: When a criminal defendant is orally notified at his sentencing hearing that he will be subject to postrelease control following completion of a prison term, but that information is omitted from the court's written journal entry recording his sentence, may the court later correct that error without a hearing by means of a "nunc pro tunc" journal entry, or must the court conduct a new sentencing hearing?
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2025 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.