Archive
 
Video Library
Broadcast
 
Broadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAffiliatesDaily Streaming Schedule
About
 
About the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
ARCHIVEBROADCASTABOUT
Total Views 87,281,857
Total Views 87,281,857
Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator Affiliates Daily Streaming Schedule
 
 
About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Case No. 2011-0008 and 2011-0010 State of Ohio v. Mario Harris Expand
 
 
November 15, 2011
11-15-2011
3,014 Views
Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 360p VideoDownload 720p Video
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
Must Trial Court's Sentencing Entry Note Forfeiture Requirement In Order to Be 'Final, Appealable Order?'

8th District Court of Appeals (Cuyahoga County)

ISSUES:

* When a trial court's judgment of conviction in a criminal case includes a specification that the defendant must forfeit to the state certain property used in commission of his crime(s), but the journal entry recording the defendant's sentence does not include any reference to the forfeiture, is the sentencing order a "final" order subject to immediate appeal notwithstanding that omission, or does the omission of the forfeiture deprive a court of appeals of jurisdiction to review the case until it has been remanded to the trial court for resentencing?

* When the sentence imposed on a defendant for a criminal offense omits a driver license suspension that is mandatory for all persons convicted of that offense, does that omission render the defendant's sentence void and require a complete resentencing, or is the defendant entitled only to a new sentencing hearing limited to the issue of the license suspension?
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2011-0008
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2011-0008
Opinion Summary For Case #2011-0008
Case Information For Case #2011-0010
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2011-0010
Opinion Summary For Case #2011-0010
 
Tags
Ohio GovernmentJudicial BranchSupreme Court of Ohio
 
Markers Transcript
 
00:00:14 T. Allen Regas for the State of Ohio
00:12:03 Sarah G. Lopresti for Mario Harris
00:19:41 Summation: T. Allen Regas for the State of Ohio
There is no transcript for this video.
Note : Transcripts are compiled from uncorrected captions
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2025 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.