Archive
 
Video Library
Broadcast
 
Broadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAffiliatesDaily Streaming Schedule
About
 
About the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
ARCHIVEBROADCASTABOUT
Total Views 87,500,767
Total Views 87,500,767
Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator Affiliates Daily Streaming Schedule
 
 
About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Case No. 2010-1448 State of Ohio v. Christopher Barker (Mp3) Expand
 
 
June 7, 2011
06-07-2011
1,162 Views
Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download File
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Description
Does Warning That No-Contest Plea Waives Right to 'Call Witnesses' Meet Requirement of Criminal Rules?

In Court's Colloquy With Defendant Before Accepting Guilty or No-Contest Plea?

State of Ohio v. Christopher Barker, Case no. 2010-1448

6th District Court of Appeals (Lucas County)

ISSUE: In conducting the colloquy (dialogue) with a criminal defendant required by Ohio Criminal Rule 11(C)(2)(c) prior to accepting a guilty or no contest plea to a felony, does a trial judge who informs the defendant that his plea will waive his right to "call witnesses to speak on your behalf" satisfy the requirement that the defendant be advised he is giving up the right to "compulsory process of witnesses?"
Tags
Ohio GovernmentJudicial BranchSupreme Court of Ohio
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2025 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.