Video
 
Video LibraryOhio Channel Live
Store
 
Online StoreShopping Cart
About
 
Program DirectoryBroadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAbout the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsAffiliatesJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
VIDEOSTOREABOUT
 
Video Library Ohio Channel Live
 
 
Online Store Shopping Cart
 
 
Program Directory Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Affiliates Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Supreme Court of Ohio - Case Nos. 2019-1247 & 2019-1309 Lingle v. State Expand
 
 
July 8, 2020
07-08-2020
153 Views
Audio Only Share Buy
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Width    px      Height    px
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
Harmon Lingle and Mark Grosser v. State of Ohio et al., Case Nos. 2019-1247 and 2019-1309
Tenth District Court of Appeals (Franklin County)

ISSUES:
- Is a person with an out-of-state sex-offense conviction not required to register in Ohio as a "sexual predator" if the person can show that the home-state registration requirement isn't substantially similar to Ohio law because that requirement doesn't fit the definition of "sexual predator" in former R.C. 2950.01(E)?
- Does former R.C. 2950.01(F) provide an out-of-state sex offender who challenges the automatic classification in Ohio as a "sexual predator" with the right to a hearing to determine whether the offender is likely to commit a sex offense in the future?
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2019-1247
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2019-1247
Case Information For Case #2019-1309
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2019-1309
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2021 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.