Archive
 
Video Library
Store
 
Online StoreShopping Cart
About
 
Program DirectoryBroadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAbout the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsAffiliatesJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
ARCHIVESTOREABOUT
 
Video Library
 
 
Online Store Shopping Cart
 
 
Program Directory Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Affiliates Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Supreme Court of Ohio - Case No. 2014-0532 Joseph W. Testa, Tax Commissioner of Ohio v. Kent W. and Sue E. Cunningham Expand
 
 
March 10, 2015
03-10-2015
2,604 Views
Share Download Buy
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Width    px      Height    px
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 360p Video
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
What Is the Meaning of "Domicile" When Determining Ohio Residency for Income Taxes?

Joseph W. Testa, Tax Commissioner of Ohio v. Kent W. and Sue E. Cunningham, Case No. 2014-0532

Ohio Board of Tax Appeals

ISSUES:

- Is a person's "domicile" the place where the person has a true, fixed, and permanent home that continues until the person abandons it and intends to abandon it?

- Is this common law understanding of "domicile" incorporated into R.C. 5747.24, which determines whether a taxpayer has residency in Ohio?
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2014-0532
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2014-0532
 
Markers Transcript
 
00:00:35 Daniel Fausey for Joseph Testa, Tax Commissioner of Ohio
00:15:59 Donald Mottley for Kent Cunningham and Sue Cunningham
00:32:18 Summation: Daniel Fausey for Joseph Testa, Tax Commissioner of Ohio
There is no transcript for this video.
Note : Transcripts are compiled from uncorrected captions
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2021 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.